four years ago - you have two boys in public high school in milwaukee. > here is my question really kind of off the policy area but i think it is important to me and i think it might be important to others. > how much time do we have left? i have two questions and i want to make sure i get to one. do it more effectively and more efficiently and ultimately in a way that is more accountable at the local and state level. i think there are so many examples out there that would help us not only balance the budget, but in the end, it would avoid the false choice of between balancing the budget and giving up services. why not say when it comes to education instead of sending that money here, why not keep that dollar back in the local community so that the local school board can put that money in the classroom. medicaid is an issue we talked about many times before.Ī way that is most cost efficient. to me to tackle the challenges take money otherwise spent here or dictated here and send it back to the states and local governments where it is much more accountable to the regular taxpayer. and then for a good part goes back to the theme of what i mentioned.
#Governor national issues dominate ad wars how to
we can be responsible in doing that and make responsible reasonable expectations of how to streamline the way that we provide that security through the department of defense and other mechanisms out of this. it is about safety and security of the american citizens and of those freedom loving people around the world who love the values. part is for me whether it is the local government, fire and police or here in the federal government has got to be protection.
in washington, a matter of setting priorities. System the only one fully funded in the country, and we made the tough decisions and our state is that much better off because of it. and the kaiser family foundation which doesn't have an angle said we did not take the, medicaid expansion that has no insurance gaps we tried to find common sense conservative forums that could work. that means there's no waiting list in our state. we were actually if a great - in a great position because what it allowed us to do is to say we restored medicaid to what it was intended to be that is providing access for people living in poverty and for all those living above that we transition into the marketplace. because of the supreme court the other part i like, but the part of the ruling on the affordable care act the state can control their destinies when it comes to medicaid.
so there was a waiting list literally for people living in poverty who were on a waiting list to get assistance and access to this. and as unfortunate as is often done he didn't put enough money into it. Medicaid is not just for people in poverty, it is at twice the level of poverty particularly for adults without children.
0 kommentar(er)
